Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1930No. Criminal No. 720PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The defendant was convicted of embezzlement. He appeals from the judgment and the order overruling his motion for a new trial. He complains of the information not stating facts sufficient to constitute a public offense, and we 'therefore set out the charging part thereof:

“That on or about the said 9th day of June, 1929, one M. A. Barker was the clerk, agent and servant of the Calumet and Arizona Mining Company,_ a corporation, (New Cornelia Mines at Ajo, Arizona,) and by virtue of his employment as such clerk, agent and servant, the said M. A. Barker was intrusted with, and there came into…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Bishop v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Lessee of Washington Sockman v. SockmanOhio Supreme Court · 1849
  4. State v. McCarteySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  5. Mills v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Palmer Ford, Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. MannosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. State v. HoldenArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API