Legal Opinion

Klein v. Maddox

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1943No. Civ. 12405PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetebs, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action for partition of a parcel of real property in Mariposa County. The trial court made an order confirming the report of a referee that physical partition could not be had without injury to the interests of the parties, and directing the referee to proceed with a sale of the property. From that order defendants appeal. It is the position of defendants that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding that there cannot be a physical partition without prejudice to the parties, and that the order is insufficient because it fails to include a finding on an issue…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Brodie v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Garland v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Cavagnaro v. DelmasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. First National Bank v. StansburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martino v. DeneviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Moriarty v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Coleman v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Maguire v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Brown v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API