Klein v. Maddox
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPetebs, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action for partition of a parcel of real property in Mariposa County. The trial court made an order confirming the report of a referee that physical partition could not be had without injury to the interests of the parties, and directing the referee to proceed with a sale of the property. From that order defendants appeal. It is the position of defendants that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding that there cannot be a physical partition without prejudice to the parties, and that the order is insufficient because it fails to include a finding on an issue…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Brodie v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Garland v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Cavagnaro v. DelmasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- First National Bank v. StansburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Martino v. DeneviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Moriarty v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Coleman v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Maguire v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Brown v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.