Legal Opinion

People v. Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1998PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his guilty plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made (see, People v Ferguson, 192 AD2d 800, lv denied 82 NY2d 717). Defendant failed to object to the enhanced sentence or to seek to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction based upon the imposition of the sentence. Thus, defendant’s contentions concerning the enhanced sentence are not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Ramirez, 210 AD2d 56, lv denied 84 NY2d 1037). We decline to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. People v. RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. WebbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. People v. FasoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API