Legal Opinion
Brown v. Curtis
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 11, 2003No. 97,727PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONALD J. STUBBLEFIELD, Judge:
¶ 1 Defendants, George Curtis and George Curtis, Jr. (the Curtises), appeal from orders of the Trial Court denying their request for a discovery-related attorney fee award/sanction against Plaintiff, Jim Brown (Brown), and denying their motion to strike certain evidence. Based on review of the record on appeal and applicable law, we affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Brown originally brought the action for breach of contract against the Curtises and additional defendants, George Cheek and Jay Belt, alleging that all of the defendants had breached…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Payne v. DewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Meadows v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Hammonds v. Osteopathic Hospital Founders Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Conterez v. O'DONNELLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Le v. Total Quality Logistics, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- Elliott v. McCalebCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Garage Storage Cabinets, L.L.C. v. MitchellCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Protective Health Services v. Billings Fairchild Center, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009