Legal Opinion
California ex rel. Lockyer v. United States Department of Agriculture
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 29, 2006No. Nos. C05-03508 EDL, C05-04038 EDLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Previously, in these consolidated cases, the Court held on cross-motions for summary judgment that Defendants violated the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4370d, the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531-1544 and the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, by issuing the State Petitions for Inventoried Roadless Area Management Rule (“State Petitions Rule”) (70 Fed.Reg. 25,654 (May 13, 2005) (to be codified at 36 C.F.R. pt. 294)) without complying with the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Conner v. BurfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. US DEPT. OF AGRICULT.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- United States v. AMC Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Amc EntertainmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008