Legal Opinion

Ragland Mills, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1989No. 15304PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

This is a products liability action based on the malfunction of a 1982 Cadillac automobile. The recovery sought by the plaintiff is limited to recovery for damage to the product itself and is sought on three alternative theories: (1) negligence; (2) breach of implied warranty of merchantability, and (3) strict liability in tort. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant at the close of the plaintiffs case. The plaintiff appeals. We reverse and remand.

Preliminarily, some elementary principles bear restatement. The first is that if the plaintiff made a submissible case…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Rustici v. WeidemeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Groppel Co. v. United States Gypsum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Renaissance Leasing, LLC v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Kansas City v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. In re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
  4. Hope v. Nissan North America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Linegar v. Armour of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API