Legal Opinion
State v. Odom
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 17, 2006No. 20060106PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] The State of North Dakota appeals the trial court’s order suppressing evidence found during a search of a locked safe in Charles Odom’s hotel room after Odom gave consent to police to search the room. The State claims Odom’s consent to search the room allowed the police to search the safe. We reverse the trial court’s order suppressing the evidence found in the hotel room safe and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] On December 4, 2005, a Bismarck Days Inn manager informed Bismarck Police Detective Cody Trom that Odom was staying at the hotel. Trom contacted Detective…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Zoila MelgarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Elsie MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- State v. WoinarowiczNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. Arturo Torres and Ramon R. Vargas-Hernandez, Also Known as Ramon VargasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Glenn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- State v. HawkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. AdamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BoheNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. DelaneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.