Legal Opinion
Ricoh Co., Ltd. v. Katun Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 3, 2007No. Civ. 03-2612(WHW)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, Senior District Judge.
Defendants General Plastics Industrial Co., Ltd. (“GPI”), Katun Corporation (“Katun”) PNA Holdings, LLC, and Nashua Corporation (“Nashua”) (together, “Defendants”) move for summary judgment on the invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,075,963 (“the '963 patent”) based on the definiteness requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112. In connection with that motion, plaintiffs Ri-coh Company, Ltd., Ricoh Corporation, and Ricoh Electronics, Inc. (together, “Ri-coh”) move for leave to file a sur-reply. Defendants also move for partial summary judgment of anticipation of the '963…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lamoureux v. AnazaoHealth Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- LEADER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Technology Patents LLC v. Deutsche Telekom AgDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010