Legal Opinion

Liu Feng v. Kitsure-BJT

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 26, 2026No. 1:25-cv-09209Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LIU FENG, Plaintiff, No. 25 CV 9209 v. Judge Manish S. Shah KITSURE-BJT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Liu Feng owns a design patent for a sink caddy and brought suit against defendant Kitsure-BJT for patent infringement based on sink caddies Kitsure manufactures and sells. Defendant moves to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. The motion is denied. I. Legal Standards Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) governs dismissals based on failure to state a claim upon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Ann Bogie v. Joan AlexandraSangerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Samish Indian Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API