Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Horowitz, Greener & Stengel, LLP
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 13, 2005No. 03 Civ. 5510(JGK)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company (“PIIC”), brings this diversity action seeking a declaratory judgment that an insurance policy issued to the defendants/third-party plaintiffs, the law firm of Horowitz, Greener, & Stengel (“HGS”) and its members, Barry Horowitz (“Horowitz”), Robert Greener (“Greener”), and Adam Stengel (“Stengel”), is void and that the policy does not cover a claim that HGS filed in response to an action brought against HGS and Horowitz by a former client of HGS (the “Unger claim”). HGS, Horowitz, Greener, and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rockland Exposition, Inc. v. Great American Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Colony Insurance v. Crusader InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- U.S. Underwriters Insurance v. LandauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Cohen v. Utica First InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Erie Painting & Maintenance, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.