Legal Opinion

Bank of Clarke County v. Gilman

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action by the Bank of Clarke County against Theodore Gilman and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Submission of controversy on agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section-1279, Code Civ. Proc. Plaintiff and the defendants are engaged in the business of banking,—the former at Berryville, Va.; the latter in the city of New York.

Read the full summary

Action by the Bank of Clarke County against Theodore Gilman and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Submission of controversy on agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section-1279, Code Civ. Proc. Plaintiff and the defendants are engaged in the business of banking,—the former at Berryville, Va.; the latter in the city of New York. On the 32th of January, 1892, the plaintiff sent to J. J. Nicholson & Sons, bankers at Baltimore, without any special instructions or previous-special agreement varying the legal effect of its indorsement, a check of which it was the holder. The check was drawn on the…

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The general proposition which lies' at the foundation of a discussion of the merits of this controversy found expression by the court of appeals in Dickerson v. Wason, 47 N. Y. 439, in the following language:

“Where persons in the business of banking and collecting send to their correspondents or agents, in the regular course of business of receiving and sending notes between them for collection for mutual account, business paper received from customers for collection, the agent or correspondent acquires no better title to it or its proceeds than was owned by the one transmitting it, unless…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commercial Bank of Pa. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. The People v. . the City Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. National Park Bank of New York v. Seaboard BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Manufacturers' National Bank v. Continental BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heid Bros., Inc. v. Commercial Nat. Bank of HutchinsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Soma v. HandrulisNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Bank of America v. WaydellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Wolf v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Dale v. HepburnNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API