Legal Opinion

Heid Bros., Inc. v. Commercial Nat. Bank of Hutchinson

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1922No. 305-3623PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The statement of the case made by the Court of Civil Appeals, and adopted by us, follows:

*909“This suit involves a fund in the possession of the Security National Banl^ of-Dallas, Tex., garnishee, in a suit brought by the appellee, Heid Bros., Incorporated, of El Paso, Tex., against the Pierson-Lathrop Grain Company of Hutchinson, Kan.
“The litigation arose out of the following facts: In ^.ugust, 1918, Heid Bros, contracted to purchase three carloads of corn from Pier-son-Lathrop Grain Company. The corn was shipped from Hutchinson, Kan. The initial carrier issued an order bill of lading covering…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commercial Bank of Pa. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. PRESIDENT AND DIRECTORS OF THE BANK OF WASHINGTON v. Triplett & NealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  4. Allen v. Merchant's BankCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  5. Continental National Bank v. WeemsTexas Supreme Court · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. The People v. SmallIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co. v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Pigg v. Houston & LiggettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  4. Falk & Co. v. South Texas Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Citizens Bank of Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API