Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Bondurant
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Notice of appeal was timely given. G.S. 1-279; App. R. 3. The appeal is properly before us.
I
North Carolina, apparently alone among American jurisdictions, continues to adhere to the rule that once the statute of limitations has been properly pleaded in defense the burden of proof shifts to the plaintiff to show that the action was filed within the statutory period. Lea Co. v. N.C. Bd. of Transp., 308 N.C. 603, 304 S.E. 2d 164 (1983); Little v. Rose, 285 N.C. 724, 208 S.E. 2d 666 (1974); see 54 C.J.S. Limitations of Actions Section 386 (1948). This anomalous rule survived the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Fulp v. FulpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Little v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- West v. G. D. Reddick, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of CaryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Clark v. Visiting Health Professionals, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Vreede v. KochCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Marlowe v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- KROGER LTD. PARTNERSHIP I v. GuastelloCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.