KROGER LTD. PARTNERSHIP I v. Guastello
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Judge.
Thomas Guastello (“defendant”) appeals from an order of the trial court concluding that his commercial tenant, Kroger Limited Partnership I (“Kroger”), did not default on its lease when it demolished a garden shop on the site of the leased premises in order to erect a post office building. The trial court concluded defendant’s consent to demolition of the garden shop was not required under the terms of the lease, and defendant was therefore not entitled to damages. Defendant contends the trial court erred in its construction of the lease. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lexington Insurance v. Tires Into Recycled Energy & Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. CuthrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Davidson County v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Hemric v. GroceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Mann Contractors, Inc. v. Flair With Goldsmith Consultants-II, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harris v. StewartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Ashe Cnty. v. Ashe Cnty. Plan. Bd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
- Ashe County v. Ashe Cnty. Plan. Bd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2025
- Ehp Land Co., Inc. v. BosherNorth Carolina Business Court · 2010