Legal Opinion

Gerald L. Brumley v. United States Department of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1994No. 93-3051PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

Gerald Brumley appeals from the district court’s 1 order dismissing his suit under the Federal Employees Compensation Act (FECA), 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq. We affirm.

Brumley filed a pro se complaint alleging that the Department of Labor (DOL), through the Office of Workers Compensation Programs (OWCP), failed to disburse FECA benefits for his disability. According to the complaint, OWCP accepted Brumley’s claim of total disability and required him to choose either FECA benefits or Federal Employees Retirement Act (FERA) benefits. Brumley originally elected FERA annuity payments for the period…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Carlton L. Owens v. William Brock, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. Merged Area X v. ClelandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. Lawrence Waters by His Next Friend, Jerry Waters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  5. Brumley v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Mathirampuzha v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Gregory R. Czerkies v. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration and Office of Workers Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. James L. Hanauer v. Robert B. Reich, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. Lepre v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. Marjorie A. Meester v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API