Legal Opinion
Kentucky Agricultural Energy Corp. v. Bowling Green Municipal Utilities Board
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided May 23, 1989No. Civ. A. C-88-0003-BG(M)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MEREDITH, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the motion of the defendant for summary judgment against the plaintiff, Kentucky Agricultural Energy Corporation, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has responded in opposition, to which the defendant, Tennessee Valley Authority, submitted a reply. Plaintiff subsequently filed a surreply brief to which defendant responded.
Kentucky Agricultural Energy Corporation (hereinafter referred to as KAEC) commenced the above-styled action against Bowling Green Municipal Utilities (hereinafter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lynn Mining Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- M & T Chemicals, Inc. v. Westrick Ex Rel. WestrickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- G & K Dairy v. Princeton Electric Plant BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1991
- Kirby v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1994
- Hutchins v. HuffDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023