Legal Opinion

King v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 30, 2015No. 15-1074Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY **

CAROLYN B. McHUGH, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Clarence King, appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to challenge the district court’s denial of habeas relief under 28 U.C.S. § 2254. The district court denied Mr. King’s request for habeas relief as untimely. Because we agree that Mr. King’s § 2254 petition was untimely, we deny his request for a COA and dismiss the appeal.

In December 2003, a Colorado jury convicted Mr. King of second degree assault, second degree kidnapping, and attempted sexual assault. He was sentenced to ten…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Gibson v. KlingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Clark v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. HurstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API