Legal Opinion

Williams & Mauseth Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. Chapple

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 15, 1974No. 1779-1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.

— Plaintiff appeals an order granting a new *624trial to defendants under CR 59 in an action brought to recover insurance premiums.

The ultimate and basic question presented is whether the facts and circumstances set forth in the trial court’s order granting a new trial after rendering an oral decision on the merits are sufficient to show bias or prejudice sufficient to permit the judge to disqualify himself from sitting.

The agreed statement of facts may be summarized as follows. Plaintiff brought an action in February 1971 to recover premiums earned on comprehensive insurance policies covering…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lefebvre v. CliffordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Knecht v. MarzanoWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. In Re BorchertWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Gimbel v. LaramieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Kay Corporation v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gerety v. DemersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ritter v. Board of CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. BurttsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Rhinehart v. Seattle Times Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Harbor Enterprises, Inc. v. GudjonssonWashington Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API