Legal Opinion
Paul D. Heimann, individually v. Erickson & Sederstrom, P.C., L.L.O., and John Does 1-10
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided March 2, 2026No. 4:26-cv-03068Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PAUL D. HEIMANN, individually, Plaintiff, 4:26CV3068 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON ERICKSON & SEDERSTROM, P.C., L.L.O., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EX PARTE and JOHN DOES 1-10, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Defendants. This case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s February 27, 2026, Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Filing 2.1 In his Motion, Plaintiff asserts that a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) must issue ex parte “because [Defendant] can destroy critical electronic evidence within minutes of receiving notice of this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Watkins Incorporated v. Lloyd M. Lewis and Sandra G. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Besinek v. LamoneSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- General Motors Corp. v. Harry Brown's, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.