Cloninger v. Russell
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order terminating the parental rights of appellant Cloninger to her natural son, Benjamin Russell. Proceedings were conducted in accordance with NRS 128.090(3) which provides that the standard of proof to be adduced in the proceedings is a preponderance of the evidence.
In Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982), which was decided after the hearing and order in this case, it was held by the United States Supreme Court that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution requires, as a minimum,…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
4Cited by6 opinions
- Kobinski v. State, Welfare Div.Nevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Matter of Parental Rights as to NJNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Daly v. DalyNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Sam Z. v. HikmetNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Daly v. DalyNevada Supreme Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.