Legal Opinion

Cloninger v. Russell

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1982No. 13987PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order terminating the parental rights of appellant Cloninger to her natural son, Benjamin Russell. Proceedings were conducted in accordance with NRS 128.090(3) which provides that the standard of proof to be adduced in the proceedings is a preponderance of the evidence.

In Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982), which was decided after the hearing and order in this case, it was held by the United States Supreme Court that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution requires, as a minimum,…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kobinski v. State, Welfare Div.Nevada Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Matter of Parental Rights as to NJNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Daly v. DalyNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Sam Z. v. HikmetNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Daly v. DalyNevada Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API