Legal Opinion

Womack v. County of Amador

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 7, 2008No. Civ. S-02-1063 RRB DADPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum of Opinion and Order

RALPH R. BEISTLINE, District Judge.

Robert Womack (‘Womack”) against the County of Amador Patrol Officer Russell Moore civil rights action California Highway San Joaquin County Deputy District Attorney David J. Irey (“Irey”), Amador County District Attorney Todd Riebe (“Riebe”), Amador County District Attorney Investigator Ron Hall (“Hall”) and others, 1 alleging Fourth Amendment claims arising out of two searches allegedly executed under warrants obtained with knowingly false affidavits during a criminal investigation into the removal and disposal of an…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. CoffeyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  2. (PC) Martin v. BleaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. (PC) Martin v. BleaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. (PC) Shannon v. BachandDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. Ambrose v. CoffeyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API