Legal Opinion

Danielle Lacroix v. Peter Rysz

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 6, 2026No. 25-AP-281Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

VERMONT SUPREME COURT Case No. 25-AP-281 109 State Street Montpelier VT 05609-0801 802-828-4774 www.vermontjudiciary.org Note: In the case title, an asterisk (*) indicates an appellant and a double asterisk (**) indicates a cross- appellant. Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal. ENTRY ORDER FEBRUARY TERM, 2026 Danielle Lacroix v. Peter Rysz* } APPEALED FROM: } Superior Court, Windham Unit, } Family Division } CASE NO. 163-9-19 Wmdm Trial Judge: Elizabeth D. Mann In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter: Father appeals the family…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. Hoover (Letourneau) v. HooverSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Hawkes v. SpenceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  4. Maurer v. MaurerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. Renaud v. RenaudSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API