Legal Opinion

Staples v. Zinn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 8, 1974No. 44410PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal from an order of the Hennepin County District Court dated April 19,1973, denying a motion by defendant for an order dismissing the complaint on the grounds of estoppel by verdict. The trial court treated the motion as one for summary judgment 1 and on July 26, 1973, pursuant to Rule 103.03(i), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, certified as important and doubtful the following question:

“Generally, the question presented is whether the judgment of an inferior court, such as Conciliation Court, is res judicata or estops a lawsuit involving the same cause of action in a higher court.”

Beca…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Winona v. Minnesota Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  2. Hershey v. Meeker County BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Schwalich v. GuentherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Rude v. RudeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. McCarty v. Budget Rent-A-CarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. SweatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Willems v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Jablonski v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API