Legal Opinion

Schwalich v. Guenther

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 28, 1969No. 41394PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

This appeal raises the question of the proper application of res judicata, or more specifically estoppel by prior verdict, in successive actions arising out of a collision between two automobiles.

On June 26, 1967, Frank Jarboe was driving his automobile when it collided with an automobile driven by Emma Schwalich and owned by her husband, Melchior Schwalich, who was riding with her as a passenger. The collision occurred in an intersection where traffic is regulated by traffic control signals. Frank Jarboe was killed and the Schwalichs were injured.

Eugene Jarboe, acting as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of IsleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Lustik v. RankilaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Jacobsen v. DaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. TePoel v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Willems v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Price v. AmdalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. LoadholtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API