Legal Opinion
Coast to Coast Marketing v. Gordon B. Hamilton Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 26, 1990No. 2 CA-CV 90-0030PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
The sole issue we must resolve in this appeal is whether an airplane is a “vehicle” for the purposes of Arizona’s Personal Property Lien Statute, A.R.S. § 33-1021. We hold that it is and reverse the judgment entered below.
Appellant, doing business as Hamilton Aviation, maintains and repairs airplanes. It performed repairs and provided maintenance on an aircraft owned by appellee. When appellant did not release the airplane to appellee when demand was made, appel-lee filed suit alleging conversion and breach of contract. Appellant counterclaimed for the value of the work…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Frohmiller v. HendrixArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Di Guilio v. RiceAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1937
- United States v. One Pitcairn Biplane, Registration No. NC-5062District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- South Mississippi Airways v. Chicago & Southern AirlinesMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
- McReynolds v. Municipal Court of the City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Samaritan Health System v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- United States v. 1980 Lear Jet, Model 35A, Serial Number 277Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- McKernan v. DupontCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- United States v. 1980 Lear Jet, Model 35A, Serial Number 277Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- No. 92-16989Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.