Legal Opinion
Di Guilio v. Rice
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided July 7, 1937No. Civ. A. No. 924PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConlan, J.
This is an action by plaintiff, as a mortgagee of an airplane, against T. C. Rice, recorder of San Mateo County and Edmund Godchaux, recorder of the city and county of San Francisco, to recover the sum of $1250 claimed as damages suffered by plaintiff by reason of the alleged omission of the defendants, in their capacity as county recorders, to comply with the duty imposed on such officers under section 4130 of the Political Code, as it read at the times in question.
Under date of May 17, 1932, the mortgage of the airplane had been made by its owner, Paul San Martino, to the plaintiff, his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. ThindSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Smith v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Gipson v. Davis Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Western Pipe & Steel Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. OlmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Cain v. MarquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.