Legal Opinion
Hubert v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided December 24, 1981No. 4541, 4542PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BRYNER, C. J., and COATS and SINGLETON, JJ. BRYNER, Chief Judge.
Paul Hubert was convicted in a non-jury trial of receiving and concealing stolen property valued in excess of $250, in violation of former AS 11.20.350(a). Evidence introduced against Hubert included a number of items of stolen property seized in the course of a search of Hubert’s apartment conducted by police officers, as well as certain incriminating statements made by Hubert following his arrest. Prior to trial, Hubert filed a timely motion to suppress this evidence, which was denied by the superior court. Hubert…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Pooley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- State v. G.B.Court of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
- Herod v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.