Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Crandall

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1941No. Civ. 13287PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT (R. H.), J. pro tem.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendants in this suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Defendants moved for a new trial, which was denied. Plaintiff filed a “supplemental memorandum of costs” for $15.50, covering items incidental to the hearing on the motion for new trial, including a per diem of $12.50 for the court reporter who had reported during the trial, $2 notary’s fees and $1 service fees. Defendants moved to strike this cost bill “upon the ground that there is no statutory authorization for costs upon a motion for a new trial and upon the further…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Begbie v. BegbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Turner v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Sime v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Sepulveda v. ApablasaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Perko's Enterprises, Inc. v. RRNS ENTERPRISESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Dawson v. Westerly Investigations, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1988
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Dawson v. Westerly Investigations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Braun v. Hassenstein Steel Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API