McIntosh v. Crandall
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT (R. H.), J. pro tem.
Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendants in this suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Defendants moved for a new trial, which was denied. Plaintiff filed a “supplemental memorandum of costs” for $15.50, covering items incidental to the hearing on the motion for new trial, including a per diem of $12.50 for the court reporter who had reported during the trial, $2 notary’s fees and $1 service fees. Defendants moved to strike this cost bill “upon the ground that there is no statutory authorization for costs upon a motion for a new trial and upon the further…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Begbie v. BegbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Turner v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Sime v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Sepulveda v. ApablasaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
3Cited by6 opinions
- Perko's Enterprises, Inc. v. RRNS ENTERPRISESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Dawson v. Westerly Investigations, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1988
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Dawson v. Westerly Investigations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Braun v. Hassenstein Steel Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.