Legal Opinion

California River Watch v. City of Vacaville

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 29, 2021No. 20-16605PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, No. 20-16605 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:17-cv-00524- KJM-KJN CITY OF VACAVILLE, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 14, 2021 San Francisco, California Filed September 29, 2021 Before: A. Wallace Tashima and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges, and Douglas L. Rayes, * District Judge. Opinion by Judge Bumatay; Dissent by Judge Tashima * The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Sineneng-SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Nolan v. Heald CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. George v. Hansen and Connie Hansen, Husband and Wife v. Melvin Morgan and Nate Morgan Jewelers of Pocatello, Inc., an Idaho CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. California River Watch v. City of VacavilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API