Legal Opinion

Vormelker v. Oleksinski

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1972No. Docket 10457Published

1Opinion of the Court

40 Mich. App. 618 (1972)

199 N.W.2d 287

VORMELKER

v.

OLEKSINSKI

Docket No. 10457.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided May 24, 1972.

Riseman, Lemke & Piotrowski, for plaintiffs.

Touma, Watson & Andresen (David C. Nicholson, of counsel), for defendant.

Before: DANHOF, P.J., and T.M. BURNS and O'HARA,[*] JJ.

Leave to appeal denied, 388 Mich 791.

T.M. BURNS, J.

This cause arises out of damages occurring to a house owned by defendants-third-party plaintiffs-appellees (hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs). The plaintiffs had previously sold the house in question to the Vormelkers who sued plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. RoyalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Citizens State Bank v. State Mutual Rodded Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Vormelker v. OleksinskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Luce v. Stott Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Vormelker v. OleksinskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API