Legal Opinion

Vormelker v. Oleksinski

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1972No. Docket 10457PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, J.

This cause arises out of damages occurring to a house owned by defendants-third-party plaintiffs-appellees (hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs). The plaintiffs had previously sold the house in question to the Vormelkers who sued plaintiffs and obtained a judgment of rescission. That decision was appealed to this Court and was affirmed. See Vormelker v Oleksinski, 32 Mich App 498 (1971). The complicated fact situation was accurately and logically set forth in that opinion and will be used here to present the factual background.

"In 1957 the (plaintiffs) Oleksinskis engaged one Russell Secor,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. RoyalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Citizens State Bank v. State Mutual Rodded Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Luce v. Stott Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Vormelker v. OleksinskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Murray v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Foremost Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Beach v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Mattis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Wallach v. RosenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API