Legal Opinion
Dierickx v. Vulcan Industries
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 22, 1968No. Docket 2,428PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gtllis, P. J.
This is an action for breach of contract. Defendant, Vulcan Industries, is a corporation engaged in the waterproofing of basement walls by application of a “Nu-Miracle Process.” By this process, defendant forces its material into and around the masonry thus effectuating a watertight bond without the necessity for excavating around the outside of the basement wall.
In March of 1954 Thomas Dierickx contracted with Vulcan to waterproof a certain portion of his basement wall. The material terms of the contract were:
“Vulcan Industries, hereinafter called the contractor, proposes to furnish all…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- MacKnight Flintic Stone Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- 525 Main Street Corp. v. Eagle Roofing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Hammond v. HanninMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Kidd v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Dobler v. MalloyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Ambassador Steel Co. v. Ewald Steel Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Body Rustproofing, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.