Legal Opinion
Kraslawsky v. Upper Deck Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 2, 1997No. D021780PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
The Upper Deck Company terminated Janet Kraslawsky after Kraslawsky refused to take a urinalysis drug/alcohol test under Upper Deck’s reasonable cause drug testing program. Kraslawsky sued Upper Deck, alleging Upper Deck violated her privacy rights under the California Constitution (Cal. Const., art. I, § 1), intentionally inflicted emotional distress, and wrongfully terminated her in violation of public policy. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Upper Deck on each of Kraslawsky’s claims. Kraslawsky appeals.
Kraslawsky does not challenge the constitutionality…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Loder v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Semore v. PoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Eule FORD, Appellant, v. Leatrice J. DOWD; Alvin J. Wilson; City of Pagedale, Missouri, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Walber Leonel v. American Airlines, Inc., Richard Branton v. American Airlines, Inc., Vincent Fusco v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lamke v. Sunstate Equipment Co., LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
- TBG Insurance Services Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Smith v. Fresno Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.