Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Addison

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2005No. 2004-2111PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} In an amended complaint filed on August 27, 2003, relator, Dayton Bar Association, charged respondent, Clarence W. Addison II, of Huber Heights, Ohio, with engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. Respondent, who was represented by counsel during relator’s investigation but not after the amended complaint was filed, was served with the original and amended complaints but did not answer them, and relator moved for default pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VII(7)(B). On May 27, 2004, respondent moved for a new hearing date and for an extension of time in which to oppose the motion for default.

{¶…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. MischOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Toledo Bar Assn. v. Chelsea Title Agency of Dayton, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Trumbull County Bar Ass'n v. HannaOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Indiana State Bar Ass'n v. NorthouseIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. In Re EstepSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API