Legal Opinion
In Re Estep
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided August 15, 2007No. 647, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The Respondent, Ralph V. Estep, is a public accountant with an office in Wilmington, Delaware. The Respondent is not authorized to practice law in Delaware or any other jurisdiction. On October 30, 2006, this Court issued an order directing that the Respondent cease and desist the unauthorized practice of law (“Cease and Desist Order”).
On December 11, 2006, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) filed a Petition for a Rule to Show Cause in this Court, alleging that the Respondent was in violation of the Cease and Desist Order. 1 On February 21, 2007, we referred this matter to the Board…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Delaware Optometric Corporation v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
- In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme CourtSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- Delaware State Bar Ass'n v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Indiana State Bar Ass'n v. NorthouseIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. AddisonOhio Supreme Court · 2005
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Matter of KingsleySupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Stewart LiggonDelaware Court of Common Pleas · 2017