Legal Opinion

Keehn v. Laubach

United States District Court

Decided September 15, 1944Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kingfield, D. C. J.

The facts in this ease were stipulated as follows: A broker solicited an application for a. policy of insurance covering the defendant’s trucks. An. *381application was forwarded to the company at its North: Carolina office, in which state the company was admitted to do business; and the policy was issued to the defendant who received the same. Subsequently in Illinois, the state of its incorporation, liquidation proceedings were instituted, wherein the defendant was served by publication; and a judgment was entered in that state requiring the defendant to pay an assessment. A…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Swing v. MunsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. People ex rel. Palmer v. Central Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  5. Stevens v. Rasin Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API