Legal Opinion
Stevens v. Rasin Fertilizer Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 28, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBryan, J.
The Commonwealth Mutual Fire Insurance Company, á body corporate of the State of Massachusetts, issued several policies of insurance, whereby it insured against fire certain property of the Rasin Fertilizer Company, a body corporate of the State of Maryland. It is admitted that the Massachusetts corporation has never complied with sections 118, 119 and 124 of Article 23 of the Code of Public General Laws of this State. These sections enact that it shall not be lawful for any insurance company incorporated under *684the laws of another State “ to take risks or transact any insurance business in…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. v. MallickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
- Maloney v. Rhode Island InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Union Tr. Co. of N.J. v. KnabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Ericksson v. Cartan Travel Bureau, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1953
- McCord v. Illinois National Fire InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.