Swing v. Munson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 443, Jan. T., 1898, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lycoming Co., Sept. T., 1895, No. 102, for defendant non obstante veredicto. Mitchell, J., dissents. Assumpsit on premium notes. Before Metzger, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was in entering judgment for the defendant, non obstante veredicto.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Dean,
The appellant Fire Insurance Company was a mutual company organized under the laws of the state of Ohio. The defendant, Edgar Munson, a member of the company, is a resident of Williamsport and a citizen of Pennsylvania. Immediately after the articles of incorporation were filed, on May 27, 1887, in the office of the secretary of the state of Ohio, the company commenced to issue policies of insurance against fire, not only in Ohio but in other states. Before the final certificate dated October 1,1888, authorizing it to do business, was issued, Munson riiade…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Commonwealth v. VroomanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Johnson v. HulingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Mitchell v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1804
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Kuhn v. BuhlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- American Fire Insurance v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Vandegrift v. VandegriftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- F. F. Bollinger Co. v. Widmann Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Kaufman v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.