Legal Opinion

Walter v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 24, 1984No. 83-2069PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

The issue is whether the trial court erred when it found, as a matter of law, that the facts did not warrant submission of a punitive damage ques tion to the jury. We hold that the trial court did err and reverse.

On May 5, 1979, Paul Walter purchased a 1954 Cessna 195B airplane in Tampa, Florida. Walter, an experienced pilot, had been looking for this specific type of aircraft for some period of time because it was a five-passenger aircraft that, if properly maintained, was a rugged, safe airplane and could be purchased for far less than the cost of a new five-passenger plane. Prior to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Wussow v. Commercial Mechanisms, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Behnke v. BehnkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  5. Badger Bearing, Inc. v. Drives & Bearings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Strenke v. HognerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lievrouw v. RothCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  3. Sharp Ex Rel. Gordon v. Case Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Loveridge v. ChartierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Mulhern v. Outboard Marine Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API