Legal Opinion

State v. Komok

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1989No. 56229-6PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This case involves the simple question whether Washington's theft statute, RCW 9A.56.020(1), retains the common law requirement of "intent to permanently deprive," although the language of the statute merely states "intent to deprive." We answer that it does not.

Petitioner Joseph A. Komok, age 16, was convicted in the Juvenile Department of the King County Superior Court under an information charging him with theft in the third degree. The trial court, the Honorable George T. Mattson, found him "guilty" of aiding and abetting his 14-year-old sister in taking a baseball cap, girls' stretch…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. CalderonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Department of Transportation v. State Employees' Insurance BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bellevue Fire Fighters Local 1604 v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. King v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. LinehanWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. LinehanWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. DIAZ-LIZARRAGABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API