Legal Opinion

White v. Searls & White Tree Service

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1975No. Docket 20490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P. J.

Plaintiff, Betty White, appeals from a Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board decision holding that her deceased husband, Clinton White, was not an employee of either defendant at the time of his death, and that plaintiff was not entitled to workmen’s compensation benefits. We affirm the board’s decision.

At the time of decedent White’s death, he and his working crew from defendant City Tree Service, a sole proprietorship owned by the decedent, were employed on a tree removal project undertaken by defendant Searls & White. The work was done pursuant to an oral agreement between the decedent and a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKissic v. BodineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Scott v. Alsar CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Krol v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Celina Mutual Insurance v. Lake States InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Neff v. Hillcrest Drive-InMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. White v. Searls & White Tree ServiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API