Legal Opinion

Krol v. City of Hamtramck

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1974No. Docket 18327PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.

This case is before the Court for the second time. In Krol v Hamtramck (Docket No. 13789, decided May 29, 1973 [unreported]), this Court remanded the matter to the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board "to allow a majority of the board to determine when the plaintiff should have reasonably known that decedent’s disability was work related”.

In its previous opinion the Court relied on MCLA 417.10; MSA 17.229, as construed in Brown v Revere Copper & Brass Corp, 42 Mich App 143; 201 NW2d 326 (1972), and Tillotson v Penn-Dixie Cement Corp, 47 Mich App 427; 209 NW2d 611 (1973). Section 10, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tillotson v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Brown v. Revere Copper and Brass Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Hayes v. Revere Copper and Brass, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. Searls & White Tree ServiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Basalla v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. White v. Searls & White Tree ServiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API