Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Rose's Stores, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff Commercial Union Insurance Company sought a declaration that it was not obligated to defend, as additional insureds, under a comprehensive general liability policy, two employees of Rose's Stores, Inc., against claims for bodily injury brought by another employee of Rose's. Circuit Judge Elwood Hogan held that under the terms of the policy, the Company was bound to defend the two employees because the policy was clearly intended to cover an employee of Rose's against a claim by a co-employee for bodily injuries or personal injuries. We do not agree.
The facts of the case are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Home Indem. Co. v. Reed Equipment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Utica Mutual Ins. Co. v. Tuscaloosa Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1968
3Cited by15 opinions
- Title Max of Birmingham, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Woodall v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte South Carolina Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Alabama Title Loans, Inc. v. White, 1091642 (Ala. 7-15-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- Johnson v. CerveraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.