Legal Opinion

Pitts v. Exxon Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1980PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

The issue before this Court is whether a jury verdict, approved by the trial court, but found by the Court of Appeals to be the result of passion, prejudice or caprice, based solely on the excessiveness of the award, can be cured by remittitur.

Plaintiff’s negligence action against Exxon Corporation resulted in a jury verdict of $140,000. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled and judgment entered for the amount awarded by the jury. The Court of Appeals found that the jury verdict was “patently excessive . . . considerably in excess of what a fair and impartial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Burdict v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Tennessee Coal & Railroad v. RoddyTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Grant v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Telegraph Co. v. FrithTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Foster v. Amcon International, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Long v. MattinglyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  3. Ellis v. White Freightliner Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Poole v. Kroger Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Donriel A. Borne v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API