Legal Opinion

Bellamy v. Payne

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 11, 1991No. 1625PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

Peggy V. Bellamy sued two podiatrists, Ralph E. Payne and Richard D. Weber, for malpractice. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the podiatrists. Bellamy appeals. We affirm.

I

By Exception No. 1, Bellamy charges the trial court with error “in refusing to allow... J. Leonard Goldner, M.D., to testify as to the standard of care owed by a podiatrist in this situation and to ... testify as to the breaches of the standard of care by the [podiatrists] in this matter.” 1

The qualification of a witness as an expert is within the sound discretion of the trial court. Howle v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HaganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Botehlo v. BycuraCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Connolly v. People's Life Ins. Co. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Howle v. PYA/Monarch, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Merritt v. GrantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dalon v. Golden Lanes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. WhittenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DangerfieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. McLemoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. FIRST FED. SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOC. v. DangerfieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API