Legal Opinion

State v. Whitten

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 3, 2007No. 4285PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOOLSBY, J.:

The question raised by appellant Danny Whitten is whether the trial court erred in refusing to charge assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN) as a lesser-included offense of assault with intent to commit criminal *45sexual conduct (ACSC) in the third degree.1 A jury found Whitten guilty of the latter offense and the trial judge sentenced him to a ten-year sentence of imprisonment. We affirm.

The victim, a woman seventy-six-years-old at the time of trial, allowed Whitten, her thirty-year-old nephew, to live with her in her trailer home. The victim testified that on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. FennellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. McKissick v. J.F. Cleckley & Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
  3. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API