State v. Whitten
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GOOLSBY, J.:
The question raised by appellant Danny Whitten is whether the trial court erred in refusing to charge assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN) as a lesser-included offense of assault with intent to commit criminal *45sexual conduct (ACSC) in the third degree.1 A jury found Whitten guilty of the latter offense and the trial judge sentenced him to a ten-year sentence of imprisonment. We affirm.
The victim, a woman seventy-six-years-old at the time of trial, allowed Whitten, her thirty-year-old nephew, to live with her in her trailer home. The victim testified that on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- State v. FennellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- McKissick v. J.F. Cleckley & Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021