Legal Opinion

Howle v. PYA/Monarch, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 5, 1986No. 0697PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

This is an action for negligence arising out of an automobile accident. In the trial court, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the respondent Joyce S. Howie in the amount of $200,000 actual damages. PYA/Monarch, Inc. (PYA) and Ray Gregory appeal. We affirm.

The questions on appeal concern the sufficiency of the evidence as to negligence, the admission of certain evidence from a consulting psychologist challenged as being incompetent, the admission of certain medical bills challenged as being irrelevant, the trial judge’s ruling allowing Howie’s counsel to cross-examine…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Landreth v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Rogers Ex Rel. Rogers v. Florence Printing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  5. State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. McCall v. WilderTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gooding v. St. Francis Xavier HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Landers v. Chrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Ward v. EptingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Bennett v. RichmondIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API