Legal Opinion
Pin v. Kramer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 19, 2010No. AC 29314PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The plaintiffs, Erik M. Pin, a minor, and his mother, Carrie L. Pin, 1 appeal from the judgment in favor of the defendants, David L. Kramer, an orthopedic surgeon, and Danbury Orthopedic Associates, P.C., following a jury trial on their medical malpractice claim. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) restricted their questioning of potential jurors during voir dire, (2) assumed the role of an advocate and interfered with the presentation of their case, examination of witnesses and cross-examination of the defendants’ expert witness, (3) refused to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Shelnitz v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. NashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians v. LorinskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- PIN v. KramerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Rosa v. Lawrence & Memorial HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- PIN v. KramerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Audibert v. HalleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Brown v. CartwrightConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.