Legal Opinion
Azmat v. Shalala
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 5, 2001No. 5:99-mj-00487PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SIMPSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of both parties for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons discussed below, we will deny the Plaintiffs motion and grant the Defendant’s motion by a separate order entered this date.
FACTS
For the purposes of this motion, the following facts are uncontested.
The Plaintiff, Najam Azmat, M.D. (“Dr.Azmat”), is an allopathic physician practicing general and vascular surgery in Elizabethtown, Kentucky. In November, 1996, he was appointed to the medical staff of Hardin Memorial Hospital (the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albert White v. Turfway Park Racing Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Meyers v. Logan Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2000
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doe v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004