Legal Opinion

Walter v. Sperry

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 31, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action to recover for goods sold and delivered, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County and tried to the jury before Simpson, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $201, and appeal by the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The plaintiff brought his action against Albert A. Sperry, since deceased, to recover a balance for goods sold, and the action is continued against his administrator.

Rulings upon evidence comprise the chief assignments of error on the appeal.

The plaintiff, a grain and lumber dealer, delivered the lumber, being part of the goods sued for, upon certain premises used for hotel purposes and owned by the original defendant, Albert A. Sperry, and leased to one Morris, and the material so delivered was used in the erection upon the premises of some bath-houses.

The plaintiff claimed to have proved…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peck v. PierceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Bissell v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865
  3. Kilbourne v. Jennings & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. Rowland v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  5. Allen v. Hartford Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dinan v. MarchandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Graybill v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Starzec v. KidaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Joanis v. EngstromSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Connecticut National Bank v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API